Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s
De : rod.speed.aaa (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Groupes : comp.misc nz.general aus.computers
Date : 15. May 2025, 22:59:08
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <op.26lzcue8byq249@pvr2.lan>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote

Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for
under-16s,

And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.

No chance in reality

and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese
for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.

One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”.

Corse it is

Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.

That last remains to be seen

Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work.

Just as true of the ban

Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.

The ban is even more useless

Years ago one had to have a card for adult sites,

Fantasy

AI Overview
Useless. We need an actual cite of sites requiring that and you don't have  that

In the past, some internet adult sites did require users to have a
physical card, like a credit card or a specific "adult ID card," to
access their content.
Just how could that physical card be inspected by the
adult site and verified that it did belong to the individual
who was about to visit that adult site and that it wasnt a
trivial to produce fake

These methods were used to verify that the user  was of legal age.
Not even possible, see above

However, this practice has largely been replaced by
other methods of age verification, such as credit card
Again,  no way to prove that it was that individual's card

or financial  verification, or the use of government-issued IDs.
Again,  no way to prove that it was that individual's
card even with a photo ID with an adult site
<reams more useless shit flushed where it belongs>

it failed

These snout and trotters in trough just rehashing what failed in past

No one is proposing a card and what they are proposing
is the whole of social media, not just adult sites.

Fantasy Australia does not have any socail media sites AFAIK
We arent discussing australian social media
sites, we are discussing social media in general.

And its never going to work given that any kid can just use
someone else's account

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 May 25 * Banning Social Media For Under-16s68Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 May 25 +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s16Rod Speed
15 May 25 i+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s14Petzl
15 May 25 ii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Richmond
15 May 25 iii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
15 May 25 iiii`- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 iii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6MightyMouse
16 May 25 iii  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 iii   +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii   i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2vallor
16 May 25 iii   i `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii   `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Frank Slootweg
15 May 25 ii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
15 May 25 ii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
15 May 25 ii  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
4 Jun10:28 i`- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Kerr-Mudd, John
16 May 25 +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Computer Nerd Kev
16 May 25 i+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 i+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Scott Dorsey
16 May 25 i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 i `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Computer Nerd Kev
16 May 25 `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s46BR
16 May 25  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Tony
17 May 25  +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s21MightyMouse
17 May 25  i+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Petzl
17 May 25  iii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
17 May 25  iii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
17 May 25  iii  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4MightyMouse
17 May 25  ii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
18 May 25  ii  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2MightyMouse
18 May 25  ii   `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Petzl
17 May 25  i +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6Rod Speed
17 May 25  i i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Petzl
17 May 25  i i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Rod Speed
18 May 25  i i  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Petzl
18 May 25  i i   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Rod Speed
18 May 25  i i    `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rich80105
19 May 25  i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Peter Jason
19 May 25  i  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Peter Jason
19 May 25  i  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s23Frank Slootweg
17 May 25   +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s19Scott Dorsey
18 May 25   i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 May 25   i +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rich80105
18 May 25   i +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
22 May 25   i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s15Scott Dorsey
22 May 25   i  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
22 May 25   i  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s13Peter Jason
23 May 25   i   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s12Rod Speed
23 May 25   i    `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s11Peter Jason
23 May 25   i     `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Rod Speed
5 Jun02:53   i      `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s9Peter Jason
5 Jun09:41   i       `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s8Rod Speed
5 Jun22:03   i        `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s7Peter Jason
5 Jun22:48   i         `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6Rod Speed
6 Jun07:08   i          `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5noel
7 Jun00:49   i           `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Peter Jason
7 Jun07:53   i            `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3MightyMouse
7 Jun09:37   i             `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Rod Speed
7 Jun10:07   i              `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1MightyMouse
4 Jun10:36   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Kerr-Mudd, John
4 Jun21:14    `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Mike Spencer
5 Jun10:26     `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal