Sujet : Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.misc nz.general aus.computersDate : 16. May 2025, 16:37:30
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m8p4dqFcbciU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Hmm4; 7b109588; Linux-6.14.6)
On Fri, 16 May 2025 15:31:03 +1000, "Rod Speed" <
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
wrote in <
op.26mj91vvbyq249@pvr2.lan>:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
MightyMouse wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote
It *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up
their act.
yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and
mining data
Precisely. How do we make them care?
Not possible
The only force they understand is legal force.
Just not possible for that to work in this situation
Also need a definition of what constitutes "social media".
Does email count? How about Usenet?
-- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.6 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "Programming is an unnatural act."