Re: Flatpak not being actively developed

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Flatpak not being actively developed
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 02. Jun 2025, 23:56:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101la7b$3ihfc$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 20:11:16 -0000 (UTC), John McCue wrote:

If so and since RHEL is now owned by IBM, no surprise here.

Yes, that would be a surprise. I thought the understanding of how the
acquisition was supposed to operate was that Red Hat would continue to be
operated as pretty much an autonomous entity, free from higher-level
executive meddling, precisely because it was the only part of IBM making a
decent profit, and the company didn’t want to compromise the goose that
lays the golden eggs in any way.

If this policy has changed, then that’s the end of Red Hat.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jun22:26 * Flatpak not being actively developed4Retrograde
2 Jun21:11 `* Re: Flatpak not being actively developed3John McCue
2 Jun23:56  `* Re: Flatpak not being actively developed2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun02:34   `- Re: Flatpak not being actively developed1jmclnx

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal