Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s
De : rod.speed.aaa (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Groupes : comp.misc nz.general aus.computers
Date : 05. Jun 2025, 09:41:37
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <op.27nufny6byq249@pvr2.lan>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote

The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...

Not even possible

Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't
they?

Not just right-wingers.  Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that.  (Most of the claimed religious objections on  the  right turn out to be social objections when carefully  inspected.)

We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so.  The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so.  The bad thing about the internet is that  it  provides no context.

There has to be some balance between freedom and control.

Bullshit

It is not bullshit.

Its complete and utter bullshit

It's common sense.

Control isnt even possible

Some control is possible.
Nope and it never has been

No one gets it 100% of the time
In spades with fucking

In the USA  various venereal diseases, like clamidia and
gonorrhea are  out of  control, especially among blacks.

Bullshit

Look it up!

Nothing to look up that says anything even remotely like that

Jesus, every medical book says so,
Bullshit

They're screwing themselves into an early grave.
Bullshit they are now

It is not bullshit.

Its complete and utter bullshit

The above is solid gold diamond encrusted truth. Why is everything   "bullshit".?
I call a spade a spade and bullshit bullshit

The mechanics of sex must be  combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught  from a young age.

Not even possible.

Yes it is.  Flog them if they refuse to learn!

Even sillier than you usually manage and not even legal

Wot? All the best things are illegal.
Bullshit, fucking isnt

Look at the USA govt debt!
Nothing illegal about that

Various religions oppose this mainly in
the  endeavor to breed more  adherents,

That's not why they do that

It's the main one!

Bullshit it is. If it was, they wouldnt be banning fucking outside  marriage

Yes they would given the roving stud could be of any religion.
Not when they started banning fucking outside marraige

and the costs of caring for bastards  and gravid mothers.

In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that

"Child benefits" do not knock them up?

But is the reason the dregs choose to have the brats, so they dont
have to work and just put their hand out to the govt instead

Nevertheless the result is poor-quality bastards.
Nothing to do with fucking outside marraige
In spades given that fuck all are stupid enough bother with marraige  anymore

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 May 25 * Banning Social Media For Under-16s68Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 May 25 +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s16Rod Speed
15 May 25 i+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s14Petzl
15 May 25 ii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Richmond
15 May 25 iii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
15 May 25 iiii`- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 iii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6MightyMouse
16 May 25 iii  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 iii   +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii   i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2vallor
16 May 25 iii   i `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii   `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Frank Slootweg
15 May 25 ii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
15 May 25 ii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
15 May 25 ii  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
4 Jun10:28 i`- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Kerr-Mudd, John
16 May 25 +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Computer Nerd Kev
16 May 25 i+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 i+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Scott Dorsey
16 May 25 i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 i `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Computer Nerd Kev
16 May 25 `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s46BR
16 May 25  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Tony
17 May 25  +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s21MightyMouse
17 May 25  i+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Petzl
17 May 25  iii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
17 May 25  iii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
17 May 25  iii  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4MightyMouse
17 May 25  ii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
18 May 25  ii  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2MightyMouse
18 May 25  ii   `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Petzl
17 May 25  i +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6Rod Speed
17 May 25  i i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Petzl
17 May 25  i i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Rod Speed
18 May 25  i i  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Petzl
18 May 25  i i   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Rod Speed
18 May 25  i i    `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rich80105
19 May 25  i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Peter Jason
19 May 25  i  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Peter Jason
19 May 25  i  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s23Frank Slootweg
17 May 25   +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s19Scott Dorsey
18 May 25   i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 May 25   i +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rich80105
18 May 25   i +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
22 May 25   i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s15Scott Dorsey
22 May 25   i  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
22 May 25   i  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s13Peter Jason
23 May 25   i   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s12Rod Speed
23 May 25   i    `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s11Peter Jason
23 May 25   i     `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Rod Speed
5 Jun02:53   i      `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s9Peter Jason
5 Jun09:41   i       `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s8Rod Speed
5 Jun22:03   i        `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s7Peter Jason
5 Jun22:48   i         `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6Rod Speed
6 Jun07:08   i          `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5noel
7 Jun00:49   i           `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Peter Jason
7 Jun07:53   i            `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3MightyMouse
7 Jun09:37   i             `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Rod Speed
7 Jun10:07   i              `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1MightyMouse
4 Jun10:36   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Kerr-Mudd, John
4 Jun21:14    `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Mike Spencer
5 Jun10:26     `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal