Sujet : Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s
De : rod.speed.aaa (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Groupes : comp.misc nz.general aus.computersDate : 05. Jun 2025, 22:48:20
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <op.27ouuuakbyq249@pvr2.lan>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 07:03:27 +1000, Peter Jason <
pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 18:41:37 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
>
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
>
Not even possible
>
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't
they?
>
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on
the right turn out to be social objections when carefully
inspected.)
>
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that
it provides no context.
>
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
>
Bullshit
>
It is not bullshit.
>
Its complete and utter bullshit
>
It's common sense.
>
Control isnt even possible
>
Some control is possible.
>
Nope and it never has been
As with every law 100% is not possible. But they work most of the time!
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense
that it does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Banning Social Media For Under-16s
Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s