Sujet : Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 18. Apr 2024, 16:53:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uvrc4q$2acf7$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/17/2024 9:34 PM, olcott wrote:
...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for a similar
undecidability proof...(Gödel 1931:43-44)
*Parphrased as*
Every expression X that cannot possibly be true or false proves that the
formal system F cannot correctly determine whether X is true or false.
Which shows that X is undecidable in F.
Which shows that F is incomplete, even though X cannot possibly be a
proposition in F because propositions must be true or false.
A proposition is a central concept in the philosophy of language,
semantics, logic, and related fields, often characterized as the primary
bearer of truth or falsity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition
I posted this here to establish priority date. I already have
another person on a different forum that fully understands what
I am saying and are publishing my ideas as their own.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer