Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logic comp.theory
Date : 29. Apr 2024, 16:26:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0oanj$1pbn5$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/29/2024 4:11 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-04-28 13:13:48 +0000, olcott said:
 
On 4/28/2024 3:40 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-04-27 17:51:17 +0000, olcott said:
>
When you agree that H(D,D) is a correct termination analyzer within
my definition then we can proceed to the next point about whether
my definition is correct or diverges from the standard definition.
>
Nobody will agree that H(D,D) is a correct termination analyzer
until you post a definition of "termination analyzer" and compare
H(D,D) to that definition. And nut even then if the comparison is
insufficient or erronous.
>
Unless they go through every single slight nuance of the details
of my reasoning they won't be able to see that I am correct.
 Then the expected result is that they will never see that you are correct.
 
Unless I insist that they go through every single slight nuance of the
details of my reasoning THEY ALWAYS LEAP TO THE CONCLUSION THAT I AM
WRONG SIMPLY IGNORING WHAT I SAY.
 Is there any reason to expect a differen result if you do insist?
 
I now have an airtight proof that I am correct. People ignore all of
the words and leap to the conclusion that I must be wrong.
I refuse to move past the first step of the proof until we have
mutual agreement on this first step. Here is the fist step:
int H(ptr x, ptr y); // ptr is pointer to int function
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 void main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }
Simulating termination analyzer H determines whether or not
D(D) simulated by H can possibly reach its final state at its
own line 06 and halt whether or not H aborts its simulation.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
(a) It is a verified fact that D(D) simulated by H cannot
possibly reach past line 03 of D(D) simulated by H whether H
aborts its simulation or not.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Apr 24 * Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2277olcott
18 Apr 24 +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2220Richard Damon
18 Apr 24 i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2219olcott
19 Apr 24 i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2218Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2217olcott
19 Apr 24 i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2216Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V227olcott
19 Apr 24 i    i+* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V25Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    ii`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V24olcott
19 Apr 24 i    ii `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V23Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    ii  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V22olcott
20 Apr 24 i    ii   `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V21Richard Damon
20 Apr 24 i    i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--21olcott
20 Apr 24 i    i +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i    i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--19olcott
21 Apr 24 i    i  +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i    i  +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
22 Apr 24 i    i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--16Mikko
22 Apr 24 i    i   +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--4olcott
23 Apr 24 i    i   i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--3Richard Damon
23 Apr 24 i    i   i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--2olcott
24 Apr 24 i    i   i  `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
23 Apr 24 i    i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--11olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i    `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--10olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i     +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i    i     +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--7Ross Finlayson
26 Apr 24 i    i     i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--6olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i     i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--5Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i    i     i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--4Ross Finlayson
26 Apr 24 i    i     i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--3olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i     i    `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--2Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i    i     i     `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Ross Finlayson
27 Apr 24 i    i     `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1olcott
19 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V22olcott
20 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V21Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--186olcott
20 Apr 24 i     +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--3Richard Damon
20 Apr 24 i     i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--2olcott
20 Apr 24 i     i `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--1Richard Damon
20 Apr 24 i     `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--182olcott
20 Apr 24 i      +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--3Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i      i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--2olcott
21 Apr 24 i      i `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--1Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i      `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--178olcott
22 Apr 24 i       `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--177olcott
24 Apr 24 i        `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--176olcott
25 Apr 24 i         +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--171Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--170olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--10Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--9olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--8Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--7olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--6Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--2olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i    i`- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--2olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i    i`- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i    `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Ross Finlayson
25 Apr 24 i         i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--159olcott
26 Apr 24 i         i  +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i         i  +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--139olcott
26 Apr 24 i         i  i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--138Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i         i  i `* D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does137olcott
26 Apr 24 i         i  i  +- Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does1Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i  `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does135olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i   `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does134Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i    `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does133olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i     `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does132Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i      `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does131olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i       `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does130Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i        +- Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does1olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i        +- Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does1olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i        `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3127olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i         `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3126Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i          `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3125olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i           `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3124Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i            `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3123olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             +* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V319Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i`* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V318olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V317Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i  `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V316olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i   `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V315Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i    `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V314olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i     `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V313Richard Damon
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i      `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V312olcott
27 Apr 24 i         i  i             i       `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V311Richard Damon
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i        `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V310olcott
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i         `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V39Richard Damon
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i          `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V38olcott
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i           `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V37Richard Damon
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i            `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V36olcott
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i             `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V35Richard Damon
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i              `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V34olcott
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i               `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V33Richard Damon
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i                `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V32olcott
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             i                 `- Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V31Richard Damon
28 Apr 24 i         i  i             `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3103olcott
28 Apr 24 i         i  i              +- Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V31Richard Damon
29 Apr 24 i         i  i              `* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3101olcott
29 Apr 24 i         i  i               +* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V399Mikko
29 Apr 24 i         i  i               i`* Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V398olcott
30 Apr 24 i         i  i               `- Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V31Richard Damon
28 Apr 24 i         i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--18olcott
25 Apr 24 i         `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--4olcott
18 Apr 24 +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V254olcott
18 Apr 24 `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V22olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal