Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===

On 5/7/24 10:39 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/7/2024 9:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/7/24 7:30 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/7/2024 5:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/7/24 1:31 PM, olcott wrote:
>

Once someone has definitely proven to not be telling the truth
about any specific point it is correct to assume any other
assertions about this same point are also false until evidence
arises to the contrary.

>
Then I guess we can just go and ignore everything you have said.
>
PERIOD.

>
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
>
Message-ID: <v0ummt$2qov3$2@i2pn2.org>
*When you interpret*
On 5/1/2024 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > On 5/1/24 11:51 AM, olcott wrote:
*Every D simulated by H that cannot possibly*
*stop running unless aborted by H*
>
as *D NEVER simulated by H*
>
you have shown a reckless disregard for the truth
that would win a defamation case.

>
Nope, It is clear you don't understand the logic of qualifiers.
>

 *Prove it on this point*
Exactly how can ALWAYS: ∀x be construed as NEVER: ∄x

if there are no x.
All x means there does not exist an x that is not that condition, thus all x have any legal property if there are no x.
I guess that proves that you lie.

 

>
*I will repeat this reply every day until you tell the truth*
*I will repeat this reply every day until you tell the truth*
*I will repeat this reply every day until you tell the truth*
*I will repeat this reply every day until you tell the truth*
>

>
But I HAVE told the truth, you LIE when you say I do not.
>
I have proven you claim that it is impossible for an H to simulated D past line 3.
>
THe fact you overlooked it doesn't make the proof invalid.
>

 It is categorically impossible and you know it.
It is the same shim-sham as your other proof.

Then why was I able to post it and not have you refute it?
Are you willing to put up or shut up on that fact?

 

The fact that you won't take the put up or shut up challange indicates that you have enough doubt that your repeating it is just a lie.

 The pillow guy keeps saying that he has proof and is having
all of his assets taken away because he know that he lies
about this.
>

Right, but he never posts it.
I Have, you just can't find it, even though you read it, just like all the election deniers can't find the evidence of their claim.