Sujet : Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logic comp.theoryDate : 16. May 2024, 03:20:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v23n0n$16ejm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/13/2024 9:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/13/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
>
Remember, p defined as ~True(L, p) is BY DEFINITION a truth bearer, as True must return a Truth Value for all inputs, and ~ a truth valus is always the other truth value.
>
>
Can a sequence of true preserving operations applied to expressions
that are stipulated to be true derive p?
No, so True(L, p) is false
and thus ~True(L, p) is true.
>
Can a sequence of true preserving operations applied to expressions
that are stipulated to be true derive ~p?
No, so False(L, p) is false,
On 5/15/2024 7:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> Which has NOTHING to do with the above, as
> we never refered to False(L,p).
*YES WE DID IMMEDIATELY ABOVE YOU SAID THAT False(L, p) is false*
*YES WE DID IMMEDIATELY ABOVE YOU SAID THAT False(L, p) is false*
*YES WE DID IMMEDIATELY ABOVE YOU SAID THAT False(L, p) is false*
*YES WE DID IMMEDIATELY ABOVE YOU SAID THAT False(L, p) is false*
You remembered that False(L,p) is defined as True(L, ~p)
You remembered that False(L,p) is defined as True(L, ~p)
You remembered that False(L,p) is defined as True(L, ~p)
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer