Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06

On 5/25/2024 6:14 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/25/24 7:11 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/25/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/25/24 6:53 PM, olcott wrote:

*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*

>
No we need to handle them to know what you have defined.
>
After all, if we don't agree on the inmplications, we don't have agreement on what is being stipuated as the defintions.
>

>
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
>

>
They are not "Baseless" but based on the actual definitions of the terms that you are changing.
>

>
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*

 Didn't say that, which shows you to be a liar, or at least being deceptive, which is why we need to handle the implications first
 (Note, you are just proving that you don't understand how logic works)
  The implications of your specifications are:
 1) That your H is NOT a computation equivalent for a Turing machine.
 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST

2) That you simulations do NOT say anything about the actual behavior of the machine given on the input, especially about its halting status.
 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST

3) That you "infinite set of H/D pairs" does NOT correspond to the concept of the behavior of a machine, and
 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST

4) That you D and H are NOT eqivalents of the corresponding things in the Linz or Sipser proofs.
 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST
*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*

5) You are not interested in Honest Dialog, but are hoping someone will agree to baddly defined terms so you can claim support for your lies.

*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*
*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*
*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*
*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*
*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer