Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/31/24 6:54 PM, olcott wrote:"...the Turing machine will halt whenever it enters a final state."On 5/31/2024 5:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:Never said it could. But haven't looked hard enough to be willing to say it can't, but then, who cares, it doesn't say a thing about the real halting problem, since H's simulation isn't "correct" by a definition that relates simulation to non-halting behavior,On 5/31/24 6:08 PM, olcott wrote:>On 5/31/2024 4:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 5/31/24 10:10 AM, olcott wrote:>On 5/31/2024 6:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 5/30/24 11:27 PM, olcott wrote:>Try and show how HH using an x86 emulator can correctly emulate>
the following x86 machine code such that DD reaches its own
machine address 00001c47.
Why should I, since that isn't what I was saying.
>
*To me that looks like you know that*
*you have been busted in a lie and are backing down*
no, YOU are LYING RIGHT HERE AND NOW.
>
Prove that I said that the simulation by HH made it there, or admit to being a DAMNED LIAR.
>
What I have been saying is the the DIRECT EXDCUTION of DD, and the CORRECT (and complete) simulation of the input to HH by an actual UTM will get there.
>
That has always been the dishonest dodge strawman deception
CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT fake rebuttal regarding
the behavior of DD correctly simulated by pure function HH.
But it is your talking about the "correctly simulated by HH" that is the dishonest dodge,
Try and show how HH using an x86 emulator can correctly emulate
the following x86 machine code such that DD reaches its own
machine address 00001c47.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.