Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply

On 6/21/24 5:25 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/21/2024 4:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/21/24 4:52 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/21/2024 3:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/21/24 3:45 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/21/2024 2:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/21/24 3:19 PM, olcott wrote:

int sum(int x, int y){ return x + y; }
When this program is asked: sum(3,4) this maps to 7.
When this program is asked: sum(5,6) this DOES NOT map to 7.

>
Right.
>

>
When H is asked H(D,D) this maps to D correctly simulated by H.
When H is asked H(D,D) this DOES NOT map to behavior that halts.
>
>

>
Nope. H(M,d) is DEFINED (if it is correct) to determine if M(d) will Halt.
>

>
If one "defines" that the input to H(D,D) maps to the behavior
of D(D) yet cannot show this because it does not actually
map to that behavior *THEN THE DEFINITION IS SIMPLY WRONG*

>
But we CAN show that it maps to the behavior of D(D) (at least when the representation of D includes the H that is giving the 0 answer) by just runnig it and seeing what it does.
>

>
No you cannot show that the mapping for the input to
H(D,D) maps to the behavior of D(D).

>
The DEFINITION of a Halt Decider gives what H is SUPPOSED to do, if it is one.
>
You claim it is a correct Halt decider
>

 When we do not simply make false assumptions about the
behavior that the input to H(D,D) specifies:
   That the call from D correctly simulated by H to H(D,D) returns

What "False Assumption"?
You just are ignorant of the DEFINTION of the problem.
You "Correctly Simulated by H" is just your own made up FABLE for the problem.
If H is called a Halt Decider, then the correct answer is based on the definition of a Halt Decider, which is the behavior of the program represented by the input when directly run.
PERIOD.

 Then H(D,D) does correctly report on the actual behavior
that its input specifies.

Only if it is called a POOP decider, not a HALT decider.

 You can see that this call does not return yet claim
that it returns anyway... The mindset of a Liar or
one indoctrinated as the Moonies were indoctrinated.

What "call" doesn't return?

 Moon's book, The Divine Principle, informs the beliefs
of the Unification Church. Moon considered himself the
Second Coming of Christ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unification_Church
 

So? More illogical Red Herring.
YOU are the one trying to lie about what YOU want to be your Dogma, but no one else accepts.
Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity.