Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 27. Jun 2024, 05:16:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v5ilj0$17ej1$15@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/26/24 10:46 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/26/2024 9:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/26/24 10:10 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/26/2024 8:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/26/24 9:12 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/26/2024 7:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/26/24 8:24 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/26/2024 6:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
Mike understands how your use of static variables is cheating.
Others here will be baffled and confused.
>
>
But the rules are the rules, and you can't create rules you didn't state.
>
>
If you really have such brain damage that you cannot remember
that we already discussed this and closed it I will start
praying for you.
>
And if I am allowed, or even required to remember that, then I can remember that your Hs are all designed to be Halt Deciders, and thus the only correct behavior for their input is that of the direct execution of the program the input represents.
>
>
NONE-THE-LESS I WILL NOT TOLERATE YOU LEAPING TO THE CONCLUSION
THAT I AM INCORRECT WITHOUT GOING THROUGH EVER SINGLE STEP.
*When you do this I will point out your specific deceit*
>
But if you don't include the restriction, it isn't there, and the fact we are so many steps ahead of you isn't grounds to say we don't know what we know.
>
>
>
YOU CAN'T FREAKING USE ANY STATIC LOCAL VARIABLES TO
CHANGE THE BEHAVIOR AND YOU KNOW WHY YOU CAN'T USE
THEM SO FREAKING QUIT IT !!!
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d               pop ebp
[00002183] c3               ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
by x86 emulator H0 cannot possibly return.
>
>
>
But it does, it just isn't emulated by H0.
>
>
THAT IS THE FREAKING DAMNED LIAR STRAW-MAN DECEPTION.
>
The "Behavior" of the input is DEFINED by the semantics of the x86 instruction set.
>
NO instruction, other than Halt, stops the processor from continuing, thus the behavior of the input doesn't stop just because the emulator stoped processing it.
>
>
When I say that there are some people that are so poor
that they are starving to death and we must halt them
>
you cannot (morally) say there is no need to help them
because rich people are not starving to death.
>
RED HERRING.
>
>
Christ taught in parables I teach in isomorphisms.
>
>
But broken ones, that are just RED HERRING LIES.
>
And, I know Christ, and you are NOT Christ, and it is almost blasphemous for you to make that comparasion, especially since you have claimed to be God in the past.
>
THAT WILL send you to Gehenna.
 I am not the liar here. I think that we have gone
way beyond reasonable doubt that you have told lies.
Really, so what statement have I said that isn't actually true.
Not just that you disagree with it, since you have been proven to be a liar, but that you can actualy preove to be untrtue.
Your ignorance does not make my statements lies.

 Maybe you are one of those "Christians" that believes
once saved always saved even if you commit genocide
for fun an profit.
 
Nope. You don't know me well, so you are just making your typical wild guesses with no basis.
That is what gets you in trouble every time.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jun 24 * DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?106olcott
23 Jun 24 +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? (typo corrected)1olcott
23 Jun 24 +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?101Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?100olcott
23 Jun 24 i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?99Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?98olcott
24 Jun 24 i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?97Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?96olcott
24 Jun 24 i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?95Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?94olcott
24 Jun 24 i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?93Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?92olcott
24 Jun 24 i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?91Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?90olcott
24 Jun 24 i           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?89Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?88olcott
24 Jun 24 i             +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?80Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?79olcott
24 Jun 24 i             i +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?77Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?76olcott
24 Jun 24 i             i i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?75Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?74olcott
24 Jun 24 i             i i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?73Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?72olcott
24 Jun 24 i             i i     +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?70olcott
24 Jun 24 i             i i     i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?69Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i i     i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?68olcott
24 Jun 24 i             i i     i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?67Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i i     i   +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?4olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i   i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?3Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i   i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?2olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i   i  `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?1Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i i     i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?62olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?61Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?60olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?59Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure58olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure57Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure56olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure55Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure4olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure3Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           i  `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure (typo)2olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           i`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure (typo)1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           i`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure46olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure45Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i             +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i             i`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure42olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i              `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure41Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i               `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure40olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i                `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure39Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i                 +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i                 i`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i                 `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure36olcott
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i                  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure35Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i i     i                   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure34olcott
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure33Richard Damon
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure32olcott
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure31Richard Damon
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure30olcott
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure29Richard Damon
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure28olcott
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure27Richard Damon
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure26olcott
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure25Richard Damon
26 Jun 24 i             i i     i                             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure24olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                              `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure23Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                               `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure22olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure21Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                 +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                 i`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                 `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure18olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure17Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure16olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure15Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure14olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure13Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure12olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure11Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure10olcott
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure9Richard Damon
27 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2olcott
28 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                           i`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1Richard Damon
28 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure6olcott
28 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure5Richard Damon
28 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure4olcott
28 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                              +* Re: Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2joes
28 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                              i`- Re: Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1olcott
29 Jun 24 i             i i     i                                              `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i             i i     `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i             i `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?1joes
24 Jun 24 i             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?7olcott
24 Jun 24 i              `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?6Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i               `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?5olcott
24 Jun 24 i                +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?1Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 i                `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?3joes
26 Jun 24 `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?3Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal