Sujet : Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 03. Jul 2024, 04:07:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/2/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>
Professor Sipser probably does understand the x86 language.
Shared-memory implementation of the Karp-Sipser
kernelization process
https://inria.hal.science/hal-03404798/file/hipc2021.pdf
>
>
And the x86 language says the same thing,
>
YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not give the Diagonalization proof you claimed you had.
>
Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand.
>
You continue to assume that you can simply disagree
with the x86 language. My memory was refreshed that
called you stupid would be a sin according to Christ.
I really want to do the best I can to repent.
>
>
But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language.
>
Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it?
>
>
You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is
incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively
proves that it is correct.
Nope, and x86n emulation is only fully correct if it continues to the final end.
void Infinite_Loop()
{
HERE: goto HERE;
}
Why do you say such ridiculously stupid things that you are are false?
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…