Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers)

On 7/24/2024 3:33 PM, Mild Shock wrote:

But truth bearer has another meaning.
The more correct terminology is anyway
truth maker, you have to shift away the
 focus from the formula and think it is
a truth bearer, this is anyway wrong,
since you have two additional parameters
your "True" and your language "L".
 So all that we see here in expression such as:
 [~] True(L, [~] A)
 Is truth making, and not truth bearing.
In recent years truth making has received
some attention, there are interesting papers
concerning truth makers. And it has
 even a SEP article:
 Truthmakers
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truthmakers/
 A world of truthmakers?
https://philipp.philosophie.ch/handouts/2005-5-5-truthmakers.pdf
 olcott schrieb:
 

The key difference is that we no long use the misnomer
"undecidable" sentence and instead call it for what it
really is an expression that is not a truth bearer, or
proposition in L.

A truth-bearer is any expression of language that can
be true or false. Self-contradictory expressions are not
truth bearers.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer