Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...

On 7/29/2024 2:18 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 29.jul.2024 om 16:07 schreef olcott:

HHH(Infinite_Recursion) and HHH(DDD) show the same non-halting
behavior pattern in their derived execution traces of their
inputs.
>
Correct emulation is defined as emulating the machine language
input according to the x86 semantics specified by this input.
>
For DDD correctly emulated by HHH this includes HHH emulating
itself emulating DDD according to the x86 semantics of itself.
>
HHH(DDD) shows the exact same execution trace behavior pattern
as HHH(Infinite_Recursion) where 3-4 instructions are repeated
with no conditional branch instructions in this trace that could
prevent them from endlessly repeating.
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
   Infinite_Recursion();
}

 No, the HHH that aborts after N cycles has a similar behaviour as
 

So you don't even know that infinite recursion is non-halting behavior.
You can go back and try again on this same post I am not looking at
anything else that you say.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer