Sujet : Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 19. Apr 2024, 00:33:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <uvs72v$1h01f$2@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/18/24 10:53 AM, olcott wrote:
On 4/17/2024 9:34 PM, olcott wrote:
...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for a similar
undecidability proof...(Gödel 1931:43-44)
>
*Parphrased as*
Every expression X that cannot possibly be true or false proves that the
formal system F cannot correctly determine whether X is true or false.
Which shows that X is undecidable in F.
>
Which shows that F is incomplete, even though X cannot possibly be a
proposition in F because propositions must be true or false.
>
A proposition is a central concept in the philosophy of language,
semantics, logic, and related fields, often characterized as the primary
bearer of truth or falsity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition
>
I posted this here to establish priority date. I already have
another person on a different forum that fully understands what
I am saying and are publishing my ideas as their own.
Why do you need "priority" to a LIE?