Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies

On 6/6/24 10:56 AM, olcott wrote:

On 6/6/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-06-06 14:27:41 +0000, olcott said:
>

The common meaning of the term [lie] is
>
noun
(1) a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive;
an intentional untruth.
>
verb (used without object)
(1) to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with
intent to deceive. Synonyms: fib, prevaricate
>
When Richard calls people liars and does not mean they have any
intent to deceive this makes Richard a liar because Richard knows
that people will be lead to believe that he is using the common
definition that requires an intent to deceive.
>
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lie

>
In some places the subject line may be regareded aa a crime unless
its author can present an acceptable proof of it.
>
It is often regarded as a bad manner to put names of people
to the subject line.
>
According to Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lie#Etymology_2
a possible meaning is 'To be mistaken or unintentionally spread false
information'.
>

 Richard intends for people to get the false impression thus Richard
lies with intent to deceive.

Nope, I want peole to know the TRUTH.

 Richard already knows that an intent to deceive is the common definition
of lie, and deliberately calls me a liar full well knowing that I have
no intent to deceive. Two other people in this forum, already called him
out on calling me a liar.

Not always.

 Richard calls me a liar with full intent to short-circuit an honest
dialogue because he makes sure to utterly fail to provide any evidence
that I am even incorrect on this key point that we have been debated for
three years:

Nope, I do it to try to snap you out of your gaslighting.

 Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]

As I have said, I don't care about that, and neither should you since it is just a strawman in a descussion about programs Halting and deciding if they do.

 _DD()
[00001e12] 55         push ebp
[00001e13] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp
[00001e15] 51         push ecx
[00001e16] 8b4508     mov  eax,[ebp+08]
[00001e19] 50         push eax      ; push DD
[00001e1a] 8b4d08     mov  ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001e1d] 51         push ecx      ; push DD
[00001e1e] e85ff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH
 *Mike Terry would admit it if he would pay attention*
*He is not a liar*
 *This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH*
https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf
 *My purpose in saying this is two-fold*
(1) Turn the conversation anchored in false rhetoric into
an honest dialogue anchored in verified facts.
 (2) Protect Richard from the consequences of this:
 Revelations 21:8 (KJV)
...all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.