Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.

On 6/15/2024 9:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/15/24 9:57 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/15/2024 8:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

 >>

>
EVERYTHING is meaningless until you start to define some of them to conenct them to actual ideas and things.
>

>
{cat} <is a> {animal} is more than zero meaning
for the otherwise totally meaning less finite
strings.
>

 But, without the link from {cat} to the English word "Cat", it provides us no knowledge about our actual world.
 

WrongO it provides the single unit of meaning that
{cat} <is a> {animal}
Encode another googol of meaning postulates and we will know
all of the general knowledge about cats and everything else.
The key basis of ALL of this that most of the experts in the
field are mostly clueless about is Truthmaker Maximalism.
If there is no physical or conceptual thing that makes expression
X true then X is conclusively proven untrue on this basis.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer