Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 6/26/24 9:12 PM, olcott wrote:NONE-THE-LESS I WILL NOT TOLERATE YOU LEAPING TO THE CONCLUSIONOn 6/26/2024 7:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:And if I am allowed, or even required to remember that, then I can remember that your Hs are all designed to be Halt Deciders, and thus the only correct behavior for their input is that of the direct execution of the program the input represents.On 6/26/24 8:24 PM, olcott wrote:>On 6/26/2024 6:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>
>
Mike understands how your use of static variables is cheating.
Others here will be baffled and confused.
>
But the rules are the rules, and you can't create rules you didn't state.
>
If you really have such brain damage that you cannot remember
that we already discussed this and closed it I will start
praying for you.
THAT IS THE FREAKING DAMNED LIAR STRAW-MAN DECEPTION.>But it does, it just isn't emulated by H0.
YOU CAN'T FREAKING USE ANY STATIC LOCAL VARIABLES TO
CHANGE THE BEHAVIOR AND YOU KNOW WHY YOU CAN'T USE
THEM SO FREAKING QUIT IT !!!
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
by x86 emulator H0 cannot possibly return.
>
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.