Is Richard a Liar?

On 7/7/2024 6:13 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/6/24 11:36 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/6/2024 10:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/6/24 10:44 PM, olcott wrote:

>
When there is a mandatory sequence you cannot avoid it.
Trying to lie about this proves that you are a liar.
>

>
What What made them mandatory?

>
Reality makes them mandatory.

 No it doesnnt.
 

I need to find a better example that is airtight.

 You need to stop lying and thinking your made up examples are real.
 

Try taking a crap and then pulling your pants
down and sitting on the toilet.
Try eating some eggs and then taking them out of the
refrigerator and cooking them.

And since the actual topic is the determinism of the program, irrelevant. (But you dare not admit that or you have to face your ignorance)
 

The actual topic is that actions must be taken
in a specific order for the same result to be derived.
When you need groceries you cannot truthfully report that
you don't need groceries before you got more groceries.
Likewise for HHH.
HHH cannot report that its input would halt
because its input would never halt.
HHH cannot report that the DDD that invoked HHH
will halt because that DDD is not its input.
HHH is only the guard of the front gate, its input.
HHH is not the guard of any other gate. HHH cannot
see the program that invokes it.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer