Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees

On 7/8/24 10:00 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/8/2024 8:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/8/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/8/2024 8:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/8/24 8:51 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/8/2024 7:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/8/24 8:21 PM, olcott wrote:

>

>
When you need groceries you cannot say that you
don't need groceries until AFTER you get more groceries.
>

>
Which is just Red Herring, as I am not a program, and the program is not me.
>

>
Free will does not make lies into truth.
If HHH reports that DDD does not need to abort
DDD before HHH aborts DDD then HHH is a liar.

>
How can HHH "report" something while it is still running?
>

>
The way that IT DOES report something while it is still
running. You love to disagree with verified facts.
>

>
Computation can not report answers while running.
>
YOu are just showing your stupidity.

 Thus printf() does not exist.
 

For Turing Machines and the like, no, not in that sense.
Think of it as the output is spooled to a buffer that isn't released until the program ends.
Yes, modern computers can do some "things" that Turing Machines and Computations can not, but they can not "Compute" by the meaning of the word in the field something that the Turing Machine can not do.
Tbhe key point is that the next program taking the output of the program can not know if that is all of its input until the running program says it is done, and Conputation Theory is about comptations do things that can feed other computations, so no output is done and fully usable until the program generating it stops.
If you define that the first thing that HHH "prnts" is its answer and it is done after that, then when DDD "calls" HHH, it resumes as soon as HHH sends that output, and it doesn't need to "wait" for HHH to stop running, as it has, as far as the calling DDD is concerned when HHH completes its answer.
Think of it as a cross process pipe instead of a call instruction, as that is what you are starting to try to define with early output.