Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 12/4/24 8:50 PM, olcott wrote:It proves that HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD.On 12/4/2024 7:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:Nope.On 12/4/24 8:41 PM, olcott wrote:>On 12/4/2024 7:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 12/4/24 8:06 PM, olcott wrote:>On 12/4/2024 6:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 12/4/24 9:27 AM, olcott wrote:>On 12/3/2024 5:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 12/3/24 6:08 PM, olcott wrote:>On 12/3/2024 3:03 AM, joes wrote:>Am Mon, 02 Dec 2024 20:48:49 -0600 schrieb olcott:On 11/28/2024 1:48 PM, joes wrote:>>You said:We know that HHH halts. It doesn't simulate itself halting.
>>> HHH can't simulate itself.
That is WRONG !!!
HHH DOES EMULATE ITSELF PROVING THAT IT CAN EMULATE ITSELF.
>
Please try and explain how you are not dishonest what you
try to change the subject from my rebuttal of your statement:
>
>>> HHH can't simulate itself.
>
That HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD proves
THAT IT CAN DO THIS.
>
But only if your think that wrong answer can be right.
I did not mention anything about answers my entire
scope is that HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD
thus conclusively proving that HHH can emulated itself
emulating DDD.
>
Whenever you go out-of-scope like this it surely
seems dishonest to me.
>
But the behaivor that HHH shows that it has *IS* an "answer",
DDD emulated by any HHH according to the semantics of
the x86 language cannot possibly reach its "ret" instruction
whether HHH aborts this emulation after N steps or never aborts.
>
>
Just a nonsense sentence, since HHH can't emulate HHH as it isn't given it,
Why do you have to keep fucking lying about this?
I could die on the operating table in two weeks!
>
What's the lie?
>
Can you point to what I say that is wrong, and a reliable reference that show it?
>
All you have is your own lies to call it a lie.
>
And yes, you might die in two weeks, and the only thing you will have left behind is all your lies.
Yes you fucking jackass this conclusively proves that
HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD.
>
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
>
>
It proves that your HHH fails to meet its requirement to be pure function
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.