Phrases that should be banned on Usenet (Was: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu programmer 
Sujet : Phrases that should be banned on Usenet (Was: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages)
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell comp.unix.programmer comp.lang.misc
Date : 08. Apr 2024, 21:44:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <uv1heb$3hol5$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <20240408122937.339@kylheku.com>,
Kaz Kylheku  <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> wrote:
...
You wrote, "people like you ... would never use a male pronoun if
talking about nurses", written by you, is already ad hominem;
it's a direct accusation of hypocrisy, rather than focusing on the
argument content.
>
If you can't handle the ad-hominem ball returned to your court,
don't serve it!

We'd all be better off if nobody ever used the phrase 'ad hominem' ever
again on Usenet.

This also goes for the rest of those fancy Latin phrases that people use to
argue about arguing.

--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long.  As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs.  In order to remain
in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/CLCtopics

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Nov 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal