Sujet : Re: on Perl
De : commodorejohn (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Ames)
Groupes : comp.unix.programmer comp.lang.miscDate : 17. Apr 2024, 16:05:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240417080523.00005e99@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:34:41 +0200
Andreas Eder <
a_eder_muc@web.de> wrote:
Really? It is a very small language and has almost no syntax.
I thought it was one of the easiest languages toe learn ib comparison
to C++ or Java.
*Syntactically* it's very simple, but explicit stack-orientation with
reverse-Polish notation is a *very* different programming paradigm than
practically everything else out there; even Lisp is closer to "normal,"
at least for functional-programming types. And that's before you even
get to the fairly idiosyncratic vocabulary or the type model that's
somehow both explicit and loose...
…