Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> writes:

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> writes:

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> writes:

Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:

>
[...]
>

As far as I could determine, some sort of path searching has existed
since the 6th edition of UNIX (., /bin and /usr/bin hardcoded in the
shell) and in its present form, it has existed since the 7th edition of
UNIX. Which means PATH searching was used on PDP-11 16-bit minicomputers
in the 1970s. It didn't cause performance problems back
then and will thus certainly don't cause any today.

>
There are cases where it _does_ cause performance degradation, if one or
more of the PATH elements refer to NFS filesystems, for example.

>
The internet RTT from Reading/ UK to Dallas/ Texas is about
0.12s. That's fast enough that there's no noticeable latency in
interactive shell sessions. I doubt that many real-world NFS
installations span â…• of the planet and hence, the latencies certainly
ought to be a lot lower.

>
You seem to have have forgotten that the NFS server needs to
do a directory lookup on the file server, which adds to the R/T
latency, sometimes significantly on a busy filesystem.

>
Well, then, which is it? Local file system operations or network
latencies?

>
Clearly both factor into latency.

Trivially, they do. But NFS means Network Filesystem and hence, bringing
it up suggests that that's about ... well ... network operations and not
local filesystem operations.

Local file system operations on a NFS server are no different
from local file system operations on some other multi-user machine, eg,
the abovementioned PDP-11.

>
Clearly the PDP-11 cannot be rationally compared with a modern
lab with thousands of pooled servers sharing storage over NFS.

The PDP-11 can be rationally compared with the situation of the OP,
namely, doing local filesystem operations on a single
computer. PATH-searching was supported on PDP-11s serving multiple
users. Hence, it's very unlikely that that's going to be a real
performance problem on a single-user Linux installation on current PC
hardware, especiall if the path has only seven elements.