Sujet : Re: Shell providers?
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.unix.shellDate : 08. Mar 2024, 20:21:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <usfog0$1rnlb$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; c0bf34e gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:46:32 -0000 (UTC), Kaz Kylheku
<
433-929-6894@kylheku.com> wrote in <
20240308013928.226@kylheku.com>:
On 2024-03-08, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
We like to give customers a soft landing when turning down services. I'm wondering if anyone has suggestions for good shell providers,
places like Panix.
That concept mostly went away 30 years ago with free Unix-like operating
systems that run on low-spec consumer hardware.
That turns out not to be the case.
Some shell users don't want to be system administrators.
"bare-bones" for the users I'm thinking of. Some of them might be able
to transition to being a system administrator, but a lot just want to
run tin, pine, mutt, irssi, tf, and so forth.
To access some remote shell account you need a machine that is internet
connected and can run SSH. That machine can just run a freeware OS with
all the above packages.
...with all the system administration that entails.
I suppose the formal name for my request is recommendations for "managed
shell services".
Thanks to those who responded, sdf.org and the tildeverse are great
suggestions.
-- -v
Shell providers?
Re: Shell providers?
