Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 21. Jun 2024, 05:20:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v52v2v$2q8of$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; 873418b; Linux-6.9.5)
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 03:37:51 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <v52sif$3019v$1@dont-email.me>:

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:16:42 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
 
I just posted a python program to comp.lang.python that sorts
parameters using strverscmp(3).
 
I already posted a snippet here which sorts strings containing any
number of decimal-numerical segments.

While I can't speak for others, something about the way you
went about that rubbed me the wrong way.

More on-topic, I did post the code in comp.lang.python with a request
for comments.  Sometimes I feel like Manfred Mann's "The Demolition Man",
where "I kill conversation as I walk into the room."  It is no exception
there, even though it would seem to be a good example of using a C binding
with python's sort function.  (Having very little experience with python
programming, I couldn't really say with confidence -- but nobody has
complained so far.)

I wrote it to learn something about python, and to be a (q&d) shell
utility that someone might find useful, possibly Janis.  Since
this is the shell newsgroup, and not the python programming
newsgroup, I think discussing the finer points of python
programming really don't belong here. YMMV.

I'm also put-off by "snip-and-snark" Usenet.  I know a few people who
do that to tick-off the person they're conversing with.  I'm guilty
of doing that from time to time, but I hope it's only when
the situation warrants it.  If my opinion matters: it's a bad habit to
do so by default.

--
-v

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 24 * Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)46Janis Papanagnou
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Axel Reichert
15 Jun 24 i`- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
16 Jun 24 +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)19Janis Papanagnou
16 Jun 24 i +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)13Janis Papanagnou
16 Jun 24 i i +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Helmut Waitzmann
17 Jun 24 i i i+- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i i i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Geoff Clare
19 Jun 24 i i i `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Helmut Waitzmann
17 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)7Janis Papanagnou
17 Jun 24 i i   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24 i i    `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)5Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i i     `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24 i i      +- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Kenny McCormack
18 Jun 24 i i      +- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
19 Jun 24 i i      `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Kaz Kylheku
16 Jun 24 i `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Eric Pozharski
17 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Eric Pozharski
19 Jun 24 i    `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)5Chris Elvidge
18 Jun 24 i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Chris Elvidge
18 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)18Janis Papanagnou
19 Jun 24  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)17Chris Elvidge
19 Jun 24   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)16Janis Papanagnou
19 Jun 24    `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)15Chris Elvidge
20 Jun 24     +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)11vallor
20 Jun 24     i+- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
20 Jun 24     i+* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)6Janis Papanagnou
21 Jun 24     ii`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)5vallor
21 Jun 24     ii `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 24     ii  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3vallor
21 Jun 24     ii   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 24     ii    `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Kenny McCormack
21 Jun 24     i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Chris Elvidge
24 Jun 24     i `* Is 'ls -v' the Final Solution? (Was: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell))2Kenny McCormack
24 Jun 24     i  `- Re: Is 'ls -v' the Final Solution? (Was: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell))1Janis Papanagnou
20 Jun 24     `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Janis Papanagnou
24 Jun 24      `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Chris Elvidge
24 Jun 24       `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal