Sujet : Re: Shell providers?
De : 433-929-6894 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.unix.shellDate : 09. Mar 2024, 02:53:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240308175149.856@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2024-03-08, Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+
u@gmail.com> wrote:
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> writes:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:46:32 -0000 (UTC), Kaz Kylheku
<433-929-6894@kylheku.com> wrote in <20240308013928.226@kylheku.com>:
[...]
To access some remote shell account you need a machine that is internet
connected and can run SSH. That machine can just run a freeware OS with
all the above packages.
>
...with all the system administration that entails.
[...]
>
Or you can run a Windows machine with an ssh client such as PuTTY or
TeraTerm, or an Android or ChromeOS device with an ssh client, or a Mac
if that's your thing.
We are muddying the argument now. The argument is that if you have
a machine which can run an SSH client, chance are that instead of that,
you can just run a freeware distro where you have mutt, pine, irssi, tf,
and whatnot.
(I disagree that this constitutes "system administration".)
Yes; if you have Windows you can connect to a "managed shell account";
that is neither here nor there.
-- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txrCygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnalMastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca