Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cu shell |
On 08/04/2024 13:53, Janis Papanagnou wrote:On 07.04.2024 23:05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:Even in the 21st century, articles likeAn extremely badly written article in *all* aspects (form, content,
<https:// [... snipped, to avoid giving it more publicity -- ANW]
facts, quality, etc.).
Agreed. I think it is a prime candidate for the worst serious
supposedly-scientific web page I've ever seen.
If it was written by a
12yo with access to ChatGPT, that would not surprise me.
It has two
indirect redeeming features:
-- It pointed me at "https://opensource.com/article/20/6/algol68",
which /is/ worth reading.
-- Its list of the A60 committee members prompted me to check, and I
found, somewhat to my surprise, that one of them, Mike Woodger,
who I worked with briefly nearly 50 years ago, is still alive, aged
101. Having recently seen a couple of new scientific papers by F. G.
Smith, the former Astronomer Royal, aged 100, perhaps we are entering
a new era of golden oldies? Richard Guy made it to 103, and was still
working past his century. I know of a fair number of nonagenarians,
not least Tom Lehrer [96 yesterday], but [mostly] not whether they are
still active.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.