Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments
De : ben.usenet (at) *nospam* bsb.me.uk (Ben Bacarisse)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 15. Apr 2024, 15:45:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87r0f6ptve.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References : 1
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> writes:

For someone who is relatively new to Unix shell scripting (me) some advice
would be more than welcome on where to begin.
>
I have two main queries:
>
>
Q1) How can one write a script which is maximally compatible with different
systems?

Use only the features described for POIX sh.

I am thinking to write in /the language of/ the Bourne shell, if feasible,
so that it could be run by either the Bourne shell or Bash, etc? (Ideally,
the shebang line would be #!/bin/sh.)

The term "Bourne shell" is a little ambiguous.  Many people take it to
mean "POSIX shell" but some people would go further and take it to mean
an older shell without some of the most recent things you can not rely
on.

Or is Bash now so universal that there's no point any longer in writing for
anything else?

That depends on the your audience.  For Linux users, pretty much yes.

Q2) How does one go about handling arguments in preferably a simple but
universal way?
>
My first idea was to iterate over arguments with such as
>
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
  ...
  shift
done;
>
and from that to (a) note any switches and (b) build up an array of
positional parameters. However, I gather the Bourne shell has no arrays
(other than the parameters themselves) so that won't work.

I read up on getopts but from tests it seems to require that switches
precede arguments rather than allowing them to be specified after, so that
doesn't seem very good, either.

Well that's what most people will be used to.  I would want

  command -o out1 file1 -z -i out2 file2

to use out1 for the first file, out2 for the second and for the -z to
apply only to the second file.

If you can accept that this is a reasonable way of working, then you can
use your previously written loop.  Every non-flag argument is just
processed from inside the loop at the point it is seen.

If you have to save them for later, you could consider building a
string of saved arguments using an "unlikely" separator string:

#!/bin/sh

args=""
sep='
'
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
    case "$1" in
        -*) echo flag: $1
            ;;
        *) args="$1$sep$args"
           ;;
    esac
    shift
done
while [ -n "${args}" ]
do
    echo "Arg is '${args%%$sep*}'"
    args="${args#*$sep}"
done

This reverses the order.  You can preserve the order with slightly
different string fiddling.

--
Ben.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Apr 24 * Which shell and how to get started handling arguments26James Harris
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments2Janis Papanagnou
15 Apr 24 i`- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Janis Papanagnou
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments4Christian Weisgerber
15 Apr 24 i`* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments3Helmut Waitzmann
16 Apr 24 i `* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments2Kaz Kylheku
16 Apr 24 i  `- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Helmut Waitzmann
15 Apr 24 +- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Ben Bacarisse
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments16Lew Pitcher
15 Apr 24 i+* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments4Christian Weisgerber
15 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments2Kenny McCormack
15 Apr 24 iii`- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Kaz Kylheku
15 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Lew Pitcher
15 Apr 24 i`* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments11Keith Thompson
16 Apr 24 i +- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Janis Papanagnou
16 Apr 24 i `* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments9Christian Weisgerber
16 Apr 24 i  +* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments3Keith Thompson
16 Apr 24 i  i`* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments2Kenny McCormack
16 Apr 24 i  i `- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Christian Weisgerber
16 Apr 24 i  +* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments2Kaz Kylheku
17 Apr 24 i  i`- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Keith Thompson
17 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Apr 24 i   +- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Kenny McCormack
17 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Christian Weisgerber
15 Apr 24 +- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Helmut Waitzmann
16 Apr 24 `- Re: Which shell and how to get started handling arguments1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal