Re: Is 'ls -v' the Final Solution? (Was: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell))

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: Is 'ls -v' the Final Solution? (Was: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell))
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 24. Jun 2024, 15:01:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5bu70$vaas$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 24.06.2024 15:22, Kenny McCormack wrote:
In article <7cbgkkx149.ln2@slack15-a.local.uk>,
...
I finally remembered which tool has "versionsort(3)" -- it's ls:
>
$ ls -1
test10.txt
test1.txt
test2.txt
>
$ ls -v -1
test1.txt
test2.txt
test10.txt
>
Does that help?
>
>
I didn't realise it could work like that. Thanks.
 
To OP: Does "ls -v" meet your criteria?

Yes, at least partly. (Why are you asking?)

It meets it in the way that it's ready available and usable
as external command. It does not solve the shell internal
additional globbing feature (like in Zsh) that would be
nice and preferable.

In the quoted form as 'ls -vQ' some pathological filenames
are (seemingly) handled, but there's some hassle with the
quotes in the subsequent processing steps to expect (or so
I think). That's why an integrated form supported by shell
would IMO be an advantage; so that we could simply write

  set -o numsortglob   # <-- hypothetical shell feature
  for f in version*.gz
  do ...
  done

At least the output from code like

  for f in $(ls -vQ) ; do printf "'%s'\n" "$f" ; done

or

  ls -vQ | while IFS= read -r f ; do printf "'%s'\n" "$f" ; done

indicates that there's still something to do, and without
the 'ls -Q' quotes the (pathological) newlines are an issue
(at least).

I think it's a typical problem that would best be solved
by a shell built-in feature. (External tools may take you
part of the road and probably with additional effort for
common subsets of the task but probably not bullet-proof.)

Janis


Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 24 * Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)46Janis Papanagnou
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Axel Reichert
15 Jun 24 i`- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
16 Jun 24 +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)19Janis Papanagnou
16 Jun 24 i +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)13Janis Papanagnou
16 Jun 24 i i +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Helmut Waitzmann
17 Jun 24 i i i+- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i i i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Geoff Clare
19 Jun 24 i i i `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Helmut Waitzmann
17 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)7Janis Papanagnou
17 Jun 24 i i   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24 i i    `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)5Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i i     `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24 i i      +- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Kenny McCormack
18 Jun 24 i i      +- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
19 Jun 24 i i      `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Kaz Kylheku
16 Jun 24 i `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Eric Pozharski
17 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Eric Pozharski
19 Jun 24 i    `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)5Chris Elvidge
18 Jun 24 i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Chris Elvidge
18 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
18 Jun 24 `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)18Janis Papanagnou
19 Jun 24  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)17Chris Elvidge
19 Jun 24   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)16Janis Papanagnou
19 Jun 24    `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)15Chris Elvidge
20 Jun 24     +* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)11vallor
20 Jun 24     i+- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou
20 Jun 24     i+* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)6Janis Papanagnou
21 Jun 24     ii`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)5vallor
21 Jun 24     ii `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 24     ii  `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3vallor
21 Jun 24     ii   `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 24     ii    `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Kenny McCormack
21 Jun 24     i`* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Chris Elvidge
24 Jun 24     i `* Is 'ls -v' the Final Solution? (Was: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell))2Kenny McCormack
24 Jun 24     i  `- Re: Is 'ls -v' the Final Solution? (Was: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell))1Janis Papanagnou
20 Jun 24     `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)3Janis Papanagnou
24 Jun 24      `* Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)2Chris Elvidge
24 Jun 24       `- Re: Numerically sorted arguments (in shell)1Janis Papanagnou

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal