Re: [ksh93] defunct 'fc' command?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: [ksh93] defunct 'fc' command?
De : geoff (at) *nospam* clare.See-My-Signature.invalid (Geoff Clare)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 01. Jul 2024, 15:00:13
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <trlalk-d5q.ln1@ID-313840.user.individual.net>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4)
Janis Papanagnou wrote:

I noticed that 'fc' doesn't seem to work on my Limux platform (neither
with ksh93u+ nor with ksh93u+m). Usually I use that built-in command
only as 'fc -l' (to list the history entries), and omitting the '-l'
should execute these commands. Alas, 'fc <from> <to>' doesn't work;
for example
 
$ fc -l 1013 1015
1013 ls X
1014 ls Y
1015 ls Z
$ fc 1013 1015
15
^C
?
^Z[1] + Stopped                  fc 1013 1015
$ kill %%
[1] + Terminated               fc 1013 1015
 
 
Is that an issue in my environment (or on my platform), or a bug?

It's an issue with your expectation. By default, fc starts an editor.
Presumably you don't have FCEDIT set, as your output shows the default
editor (ed) was used; it was ed that wrote the "15" and the "?".

If you just want the commands executed, you can specify an editor
that does nothing:

fc -e true 1013 1015
fc -e : 1013 1015

Or, if you only want to execute one command, you can use -s (without
specifying a substitution).

This is all POSIX standard stuff.

--
Geoff Clare <netnews@gclare.org.uk>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 24 * [ksh93] defunct 'fc' command?5Janis Papanagnou
1 Jul 24 `* Re: [ksh93] defunct 'fc' command?4Geoff Clare
1 Jul 24  `* Re: [ksh93] defunct 'fc' command?3Janis Papanagnou
2 Jul 24   `* Re: [ksh93] defunct 'fc' command?2Geoff Clare
2 Jul 24    `- Re: [ksh93] defunct 'fc' command?1Janis Papanagnou

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal