Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 23. Jul 2024, 16:44:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7ofkl$18d66$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 23.07.2024 13:46, Kenny McCormack wrote:
In article <v7nu8t$15bon$1@dont-email.me>,
Janis Papanagnou  <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:
...
Both (ksh & zsh) seem to show "better aesthetics".
 
Indeed, it does.  That is how it should work.

BTW, it's interesting that bash and zsh both reformat (sort
of pretty-print) the code (when using 'typeset -f'), only
that zsh keeps that literal '\n'. This may show a way (by
zsh example) how to follow Kaz' suggestion of patching the
bash. (But, frankly, I'm not sure it was meant seriously.)

But ksh displays it as it had been typed in; a raw format.
If you define your function, say, as multi-line code you
also see it that way, there's no processing at that point
(or the original retained as copy). I didn't expect that.

Janis


Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Jul 24 * bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]19Kenny McCormack
23 Jul 24 +* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]9Kaz Kylheku
23 Jul 24 i`* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]8Janis Papanagnou
23 Jul 24 i +* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]6Kenny McCormack
23 Jul 24 i i`* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]5Janis Papanagnou
23 Jul 24 i i `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]4Kenny McCormack
23 Jul 24 i i  `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]3Janis Papanagnou
23 Jul 24 i i   `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]2Kenny McCormack
24 Jul 24 i i    `- Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]1Janis Papanagnou
23 Jul 24 i `- Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]1Kaz Kylheku
23 Jul 24 `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]9Arti F. Idiot
23 Jul 24  `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]8Kenny McCormack
23 Jul 24   `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]7Kaz Kylheku
24 Jul 24    +* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]5Ben Bacarisse
24 Jul 24    i`* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]4Kaz Kylheku
24 Jul 24    i `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]3Ben Bacarisse
24 Jul 24    i  `* Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]2Kaz Kylheku
24 Jul 24    i   `- Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]1Ben Bacarisse
24 Jul 24    `- Re: bash aesthetics question: special characters in reg exp in [[ ... =~~ ... ]]1Janis Papanagnou

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal