nohup Versus setsid

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : nohup Versus setsid
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 12. Sep 2024, 05:23:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbtqcd$2sce$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
It has long seemed to me that nohup(1) was an old, hacky way of doing
what can be done more elegantly using setsid(1). Compare the docs for
yourself <https://manpages.debian.org/1/nohup.1.en.html> vs
<https://manpages.debian.org/1/setsid.1.en.html>, and tell me why we
still need nohup when we have setsid?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Sep 24 * nohup Versus setsid14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Sep 24 +* Re: nohup Versus setsid9Kenny McCormack
12 Sep 24 i`* Re: nohup Versus setsid8Janis Papanagnou
13 Sep 24 i `* Re: nohup Versus setsid7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Sep 24 i  `* Re: nohup Versus setsid6vallor
13 Sep 24 i   +* Re: nohup Versus setsid4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Sep 24 i   i`* Re: nohup Versus setsid3Janis Papanagnou
13 Sep 24 i   i `* Re: nohup Versus setsid2Helmut Waitzmann
13 Sep 24 i   i  `- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Janis Papanagnou
13 Sep 24 i   `- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Kaz Kylheku
12 Sep 24 +- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Kaz Kylheku
13 Sep 24 `* Re: nohup Versus setsid3Helmut Waitzmann
13 Sep 24  +- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Kaz Kylheku
14 Sep 24  `- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal