Sujet : Re: nohup Versus setsid
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.unix.shellDate : 13. Sep 2024, 18:26:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240913102557.548@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2024-09-13, Helmut Waitzmann <
nn.throttle@xoxy.net> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>:
It has long seemed to me that nohup(1) was an old, hacky way of
doing what can be done more elegantly using setsid(1). Compare
the docs for yourself
<https://manpages.debian.org/1/nohup.1.en.html> vs
<https://manpages.debian.org/1/setsid.1.en.html>, and tell me
why we still need nohup when we have setsid?
>
>
Because there is a real difference between both of them.
Don't confuse low drop-out with too many facts.
-- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txrCygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnalMastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca