Re: nohup Versus setsid

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: nohup Versus setsid
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 13. Sep 2024, 18:26:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240913102557.548@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2024-09-13, Helmut Waitzmann <nn.throttle@xoxy.net> wrote:
 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>:
It has long seemed to me that nohup(1) was an old, hacky way of
doing what can be done more elegantly using setsid(1). Compare
the docs for yourself
<https://manpages.debian.org/1/nohup.1.en.html> vs
<https://manpages.debian.org/1/setsid.1.en.html>, and tell me
why we still need nohup when we have setsid?
>
>
 Because there is a real difference between both of them.

Don't confuse low drop-out with too many facts.

--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Sep 24 * nohup Versus setsid14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Sep 24 +* Re: nohup Versus setsid9Kenny McCormack
12 Sep 24 i`* Re: nohup Versus setsid8Janis Papanagnou
13 Sep 24 i `* Re: nohup Versus setsid7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Sep 24 i  `* Re: nohup Versus setsid6vallor
13 Sep 24 i   +* Re: nohup Versus setsid4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Sep 24 i   i`* Re: nohup Versus setsid3Janis Papanagnou
13 Sep 24 i   i `* Re: nohup Versus setsid2Helmut Waitzmann
13 Sep 24 i   i  `- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Janis Papanagnou
13 Sep 24 i   `- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Kaz Kylheku
12 Sep 24 +- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Kaz Kylheku
13 Sep 24 `* Re: nohup Versus setsid3Helmut Waitzmann
13 Sep 24  +- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Kaz Kylheku
14 Sep 24  `- Re: nohup Versus setsid1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal