Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cu shell |
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 20:18:28 -0000 (UTC)
usuario <anthk@disroot.org> boring babbled:El Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:04:24 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro escribió:
>On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 20:04:54 -0000 (UTC), Bozo User wrote:responds>:
Perl is more awk+sed+sh in a single language. Basically the killer of
the Unix philophy in late 90's/early 00's, and for the good.
That’s what Rob Pike said
<https://interviews.slashdot.org/story/04/10/18/1153211/rob-pike->
Q: “Given the nature of current operating systems and
applications,
do you think the idea of "one tool doing one job well" has been
abandoned?”
A: “Those days are dead and gone and the eulogy was delivered by
Perl.”
But I’m not sure I agree. Those small, specialized tools always
required large, monolithic pieces under them to operate: the shell
itself for shell scripts, the X server for GUI apps, the kernel itself
for everything. So while the coming of Perl has changed some things,
it has not made a difference to the modularity of the Unix way.
The shell could be changed as just a command launcher with no
conditionals, while perl doing all the hard work.
>
On X11/X.org, X11 was never very "Unix like" by itself.
An X server is about as minimal as you can have a graphics system and
still make it usable. I don't see how it could have been subdivided any
further and still work.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.