Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 05. Oct 2024, 07:10:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87bjzzqdvr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> writes:
[...]
I'm curious myself.  That said, here's something I stumbled across
recently:
>
    background job &
    ...
    kill %1     # clean up
>
What happens if the background job has already terminated on its
own accord before we reach the kill(1)?  Not much, because with job
control, the shell knows that no such job exists.  If you do this
with "kill $!", you signal that PID, which no longer refers to the
intended process and may in fact have been reused for a different
process.

That's possible, but in my experience the system avoids reusing PIDs
of dead jobs for as long as possible.  On typical Linux systems, the
max PID is about 2**22, and newly allocated PIDs cycle through that
range.  (If you're using all the PIDs in that range simultaneously,
you've got bigger problems than running out of PIDs.)

I once ran a test to see how quickly I could make the system reuse
a PID, by forking and terminating as many processes as I could as
quickly as I could.  I don't remember the details, but I think it
took the better part of an hour.

On the other hand, I think a contrived pattern of process creation
and termination could result in a PID being reused quickly.  I might
try the experiment again.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Oct 24 * (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?33Kenny McCormack
4 Oct 24 `* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?32Kaz Kylheku
4 Oct 24  `* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?31Kenny McCormack
4 Oct 24   `* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?30Kaz Kylheku
4 Oct 24    +* Expand your mind (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)2Kenny McCormack
5 Oct 24    i`- Re: Expand your mind (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)1Kaz Kylheku
4 Oct 24    `* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?27Christian Weisgerber
4 Oct 24     `* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?26Janis Papanagnou
5 Oct 24      `* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?25Christian Weisgerber
5 Oct 24       +* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?2Kaz Kylheku
10 Oct 24       i`- Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?1Kaz Kylheku
5 Oct 24       +- Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?1Keith Thompson
5 Oct 24       +* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?13Kenny McCormack
5 Oct 24       i+* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?11Christian Weisgerber
5 Oct 24       ii`* pid ranges (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)10Kenny McCormack
7 Oct 24       ii `* Re: pid ranges (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)9Janis Papanagnou
7 Oct 24       ii  +- Re: pid ranges (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)1marrgol
7 Oct 24       ii  `* Re: pid ranges (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)7Kenny McCormack
7 Oct 24       ii   `* Re: pid ranges (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)6Janis Papanagnou
7 Oct 24       ii    `* Re: pid ranges5Richard Kettlewell
7 Oct 24       ii     `* [OT] PIDs for Linux threads (was Re: pid ranges)4Janis Papanagnou
7 Oct 24       ii      +- Re: [OT] PIDs for Linux threads (was Re: pid ranges)1Kenny McCormack
7 Oct 24       ii      +- Re: [OT] PIDs for Linux threads (was Re: pid ranges)1Lew Pitcher
7 Oct 24       ii      `- Re: PIDs for Linux threads (was Re: pid ranges)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Oct 24       i`- Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?1Kaz Kylheku
7 Oct 24       +* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?5Janis Papanagnou
7 Oct 24       i`* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?4Kenny McCormack
7 Oct 24       i `* Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?3Janis Papanagnou
7 Oct 24       i  `* bash/ksh differences (fg and other job control commands) (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)2Kenny McCormack
7 Oct 24       i   `- Re: bash/ksh differences (fg and other job control commands) (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?)1Janis Papanagnou
7 Oct 24       +- Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?1Helmut Waitzmann
8 Oct 24       +- Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?1Richard Harnden
8 Oct 24       `- Re: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get determined?1Kaz Kylheku

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal