Sujet : OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)
De : nunojsilva (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Nuno Silva)
Groupes : comp.unix.shellDate : 09. Feb 2025, 12:44:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <voa4fr$k88l$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
On 2025-02-09, Keith Thompson wrote:
Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
On 2025-02-09, zara <johan@freecol.be> wrote:
[...]
I am working on scripts in Common Lisp using shell inside,
here's the link to the code, it's GPL2 :
>
http://sf.net/projects/lisp-scripts
>
In 2025, nobody is going to download and unpack tarballs you posted to
sourceforge to look at your code.
>
You might as well scratch it on the wall of your cave with a piece of
charcoal, and invite people to peruse it by the light of a torch.
>
Consider putting your code on GitHub instead.
So that it's harder to read or download without git or specific
browsers, or even without JavaScript; or has SourceForge reached that
level of unusability now too?
I mean, while I could understand SourceForge being not recommended for
some reasons (which ones?), it strikes me as unlikely that GitHub is a
good option, given how they've been progressively rendering it unusable
on the web (three years ago or so it was different in this regard), and
I guess/hope that, for the git part, there would be other alternatives
there, or there really are none?
-- Nuno Silva