Sujet : Re: OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.unix.shellDate : 09. Feb 2025, 12:54:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <voa51q$1v05$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
voa4fr$k88l$1@dont-email.me>,
Nuno Silva <
nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote:
...
So that it's harder to read or download without git or specific
browsers, or even without JavaScript; or has SourceForge reached that
level of unusability now too?
>
I mean, while I could understand SourceForge being not recommended for
some reasons (which ones?), it strikes me as unlikely that GitHub is a
good option, given how they've been progressively rendering it unusable
on the web (three years ago or so it was different in this regard), and
I guess/hope that, for the git part, there would be other alternatives
there, or there really are none?
Well, do consider the source. Consider that it *was* KT who made that
recommendation.
-- Trump is so much smarter than anyone who voted for him. His IQ must be atleast 100. It's too bad that he believes in vaccines. He keeps gettingthose shots and they're obviously contributing to his severe cognitivedecline.
lisp scripts
Re: OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)