Re: OT: web-based source hosting

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu shell 
Sujet : Re: OT: web-based source hosting
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell
Date : 10. Feb 2025, 02:10:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87tt92ppsu.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> writes:
On 2025-02-09, Keith Thompson wrote:
Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
On 2025-02-09, zara <johan@freecol.be> wrote:
[...]
I am working on scripts in Common Lisp using shell inside,
here's the link to the code, it's GPL2 :
>
http://sf.net/projects/lisp-scripts
>
In 2025, nobody is going to download and unpack tarballs you posted to
sourceforge to look at your code.
>
You might as well scratch it on the wall of your cave with a piece of
charcoal, and invite people to peruse it by the light of a torch.
>
Consider putting your code on GitHub instead.
>
So that it's harder to read or download without git or specific
browsers, or even without JavaScript; or has SourceForge reached that
level of unusability now too?

I personally find GitHub more usable than SourceForge.  GitHub lets me
brows the code in my web browser and/or download it as a git repository.
I don't use SourceForge much, but I've found its web interface clunky
and difficult to navigate.  I find the automatic "Your download will
start shortly" with a 5-second countdown particularly obnoxious; I'd
much rather have just a link that I can download on a system other than
the one my browser is running on.

I don't know whether GitHub's browsing functionality requires
JavaScript to be enabled, since I haven't bothered to disable
JavaScript myself.  I suppose it probably does.  And I'm a heavy
user of git, so that's not a problem for me; if a repo looks
interesting, I'm more likely to clone it than browse it online.
If you dislike JavaScript and/or git, then GitHub probably wouldn't
be a good choice for you.

I have no opinion on which you should prefer.

I mean, while I could understand SourceForge being not recommended for
some reasons (which ones?), it strikes me as unlikely that GitHub is a
good option, given how they've been progressively rendering it unusable
on the web (three years ago or so it was different in this regard), and
I guess/hope that, for the git part, there would be other alternatives
there, or there really are none?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Feb 25 * lisp scripts30zara
9 Feb 25 +* Re: lisp scripts11Kaz Kylheku
9 Feb 25 i`* Re: lisp scripts10Keith Thompson
9 Feb 25 i +* OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)8Nuno Silva
9 Feb 25 i i+- Re: OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)1Kenny McCormack
9 Feb 25 i i+- Re: OT: web-based source hosting1Christian Weisgerber
10 Feb 25 i i+* Re: OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Feb 25 i ii`* Re: OT: web-based source hosting2Nuno Silva
10 Feb 25 i ii `- Re: OT: web-based source hosting1D
10 Feb 25 i i`* Re: OT: web-based source hosting2Keith Thompson
10 Feb 25 i i `- Re: OT: web-based source hosting1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Feb 25 i `- Re: lisp scripts1Janis Papanagnou
9 Feb 25 `* Re: lisp scripts18Dan Espen
9 Feb 25  +* Re: lisp scripts12Kenny McCormack
9 Feb 25  i+* Re: lisp scripts5Dan Espen
9 Feb 25  ii`* Re: lisp scripts4Janis Papanagnou
9 Feb 25  ii `* Re: lisp scripts3Dan Espen
10 Feb 25  ii  `* Re: lisp scripts2Janis Papanagnou
10 Feb 25  ii   `- Re: lisp scripts1Janis Papanagnou
13 Feb 25  i`* Re: lisp scripts6Randal L. Schwartz
13 Feb 25  i `* Re: lisp scripts5Kaz Kylheku
14 Feb 25  i  +- Re: lisp scripts1Salvador Mirzo
14 Feb 25  i  `* Re: lisp scripts3Eberhard W Lisse
15 Feb 25  i   `* Re: lisp scripts2Dan Cross
16 Feb 25  i    `- Re: lisp scripts1Randal L. Schwartz
10 Feb 25  `* Re: lisp scripts5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Feb 25   +* Re: lisp scripts2Dan Espen
11 Feb 25   i`- Re: lisp scripts1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25   `* Re: lisp scripts2Eberhard W Lisse
14 Feb 25    `- Re: lisp scripts1Janis Papanagnou

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal