Sujet : Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 11. Dec 2024, 21:29:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <1810396c90cd5e45$3874$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 11.12.2024 o 20:17, Python pisze:
Le 11/12/2024 à 08:17, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 10.12.2024 o 20:45, Python pisze:
Le 10/12/2024 à 20:20, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
...
How do you practically check your "t = t'" equations for clocks standing next to each other?
>
I read the numbers they display and I compare them.
>
Good.
>
Then for distant mutually at rest clocks with no
gravity involved?
>
I don't.
>
Sad. You don't. You can't. We can.
>
No you can't either. Sorry, There is a small technical detail: those
"distant clocks" are not moving wrt each
other.
How do you ensure that? By assuming the
condition a priori;and you can do it because
you're only applying your procedure
in your gedanken. Am I incorrect ?
You are. I put two clocks at the extremity of a rod.
Yeah, sure - "distant" clocks at the
extremity of the rod - very practical
indeed, isn't it, poor stinker?
This is quite
reasonable to assume they are at rest wrt to each other, isn't it?
No. Take 2 bodies - one orbitting the other.
Join them with a rod, do you secure their relative
immobility, poor stinker? Yeah, you imagined and insisted
Gdańsk and Warsaw aren't moving wrt each other. You're
such an idiot.
You're only believing [into] a great
practical procedure - because your is pumping you with gedanken fairy
tales where it works fine.
Nope. If such a procedure would fail it could be checked.
How could it fail if you have never used it.
No magic, and if gravity could not be ignored in a given practical setup
So, where, precisely, was your idiocy
applied. In practice.