Sujet : Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 18. Sep 2024, 15:19:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <cS9mPpjgPYis2jIPjfNBHU_99tw@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 18/09/2024 à 00:13, Python a écrit :
As expressed in the context that Dr. Lengrand didn't quote my article: when both events are the starting/ending ones of a *full* inertial segment
the condition is not satisfied for the *full* return segment.
On the other hand this condition *is true* for any "small enough" segment
either on both part of the round-trip. Again, this is explicitely written.
I used to wonder if Hachel/Lengrand really missed the point, but given
how systematically he is ignoring *that very point* I started to wonder
if he's not just a fucking hypocrite.
I think he is :-P
Ignoring basic geometry is not a solution Richard...
No more raving about Doppler effects.
Tu délires Jean-Pierre, et ton arrogance idiote t'aveugle.
R.H.