Re: Relativistic synchronisation method

Le 01/01/2025 à 12:35, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

Den 31.12.2024 11:58, skrev Richard Hachel:

At home you "tune" your clock to show UTC+1h.

 Absolutely not.  This is not what I do.
When I set my watch, as strange as it may seem, I am setting not mine, but the watch M placed over there, abstract, virtual, in a fourth dimension at an equal distance from all the points of the 3D universe to +1h.
That is to say what it must perceive from my watch when its own marks +1h.
The billions of observers in our universe will then do the same.
They will all set themselves to 1h so that the universal and abstract watch M will mark 1h WHEN IT OBSERVES that all the watches in the universe have been set to 1h at the very moment when it perceives them all, simultaneously in its own hyperplane of simultaneity, as marking +1h.
We then obtain a notion of abstract, virtual simultaneity, written on the watch M, which does not exist in the universe, which has never existed in the universe, but which is infinitely useful for regulating all the watches in the universe and speaking of a universal time that does not exist in reality.
Now, neither Einstein, nor Poincaré, nor physicists explain things like that, and worse, if we ask them "What is the notion of anisochrony hidden by Hachel?" they answer that they do not know, that they do not understand, that it is Chinese.
Yet not only do I explain everything, with simple words and understandable concepts for 40 years.
People tell me: we do not understand you.
This is false, we are in fact in theological and miraculous territory: it is quite miraculous, in the sense of "sign given to men" that one can tell me "we do not understand you". It is obvious that it is voluntary.
Jesus Christ had understood this magnificent and miraculous problem.
To the question "perform a miracle and we will believe in you", he has this magnificent answer: "Truly I say to you, you will not believe me, even if I raise someone from the dead".
He knew the power of human arrogance.
We have been in the same problem for 40 years with Hachel synchronization and his M watch, yet explained and detailed, then his notion of universal anisochrony.
"We do not want this man to reign over us" even if for 40 years he told us things that we have never been able to refute.
R.H.