Sujet : Re: Young people peering
De : eagle (at) *nospam* eyrie.org (Russ Allbery)
Groupes : news.software.nntpDate : 20. Apr 2024, 20:04:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The Eyrie
Message-ID : <875xwbn9ec.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Marco Moock <mm+
usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> writes:
On 20.04.2024 um 17:42 Uhr The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning wrote:
When I come across Usenet admins, they cannot clearly say that they
will ban and filter anyone they come across committing harassment,
nor that they will institute a code of conduct which is actively
antifascist, because the values of the network are not actively
antifascist and in fact tend towards calling antifascists whiners.
This is something every newsmaster can decide himself.
Sort of. The NNTP and netnews protocols have exceptionally poor support
for moderation compared to just about any other message board software,
since essentially everything else was designed after NNTP and netnews and
learned from its shortcomings.
You can insert an extremely heavy moderation step in front of all traffic
(but only for private groups or if you can reach an agreement with your
transitive peers), but the protocol is completely insecure, and while
there are patchwork solutions to that, you have to implement them
yourself. Or you have to rely on filtering, which is a very poor
moderation strategy that requires endless arms races with people trying to
bypass it.
And all of the more advanced tools available in newer protocols simply
aren't there (for better or worse; Usenet people usually don't like most
of these, but people running other types of message board systems use them
heavily): migrating messages to different threads, closing threads, user
authentication and all the things that come with that such as poster bans
or pre-moderation for new users but not established users, etc. About the
only thing you can do is delete the message off your server after the
fact, and the tools for doing that are very primitive. You can simulate
some of this by writing a whole pile of custom software that sits in the
pre-moderation path, but now you've signed on for the project of writing a
moderation system from scratch. The protocol and existing software base
are doing essentially nothing for you.
A lot of people prefer the Usenet model for various reasons, and that's
fine, that's something people can argue about. But Usenet's moderation
and filtering facilities are staggeringly primitive, and if those are a
priority for you, Usenet is a bad technology choice and you should use
something else.
-- Russ Allbery (eagle@eyrie.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> Please post questions rather than mailing me directly. <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
14 Apr 24 | Young people peering | 100 | | The Doctor |
14 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Marco Moock |
14 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 6 | | Retro Guy |
14 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | Grant Taylor |
14 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | rek2 hispagatos |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | dgold |
15 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | SugarBug |
10 Oct 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Schlomo Goldberg |
14 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 5 | | Stefan Ram |
15 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | candycanearter07 |
15 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | The Doctor |
7 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | immibis |
7 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Kyonshi |
15 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | Niklas H |
15 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | SugarBug |
16 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | The Doctor |
15 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | John Levine |
16 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | David Ritz |
16 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 38 | | Kyonshi |
16 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 33 | | The Doctor |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 31 | | Retro Guy |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 19 | | Kyonshi |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | Retro Guy |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | Marco Moock |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Retro Guy |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 15 | | The Doctor |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 4 | | Kyonshi |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | SugarBug |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | rek2 hispagatos |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | The Doctor |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 10 | | SugarBug |
14 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 8 | | Van Camp |
14 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 5 | | Russ Allbery |
15 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | Grant Taylor |
15 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | Russ Allbery |
16 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Grant Taylor |
19 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | candycanearter07 |
14 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Frank Slootweg |
15 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Grant Taylor |
10 Oct 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Schlomo Goldberg |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 11 | | candycanearter07 |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 10 | | Retro Guy |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 9 | | candycanearter07 |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 8 | | Retro Guy |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | candycanearter07 |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 6 | | Grant Taylor |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | Russ Allbery |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | SugarBug |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Russ Allbery |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | Marco Moock |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Grant Taylor |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Kyonshi |
17 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 4 | | Stefan Ram |
18 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | Kerr-Mudd, John |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | Computer Nerd Kev |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Sn!pe |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 44 | | The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 42 | | Grant Taylor |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 41 | | Retro Guy |
19 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | Ted Heise |
20 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
20 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | candycanearter07 |
20 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 37 | | The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning |
20 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 4 | | Marco Moock |
20 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | Russ Allbery |
21 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
23 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | candycanearter07 |
20 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 31 | | Sn!pe |
21 Apr 24 | [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering) | 23 | | The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 14 | | Sn!pe |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 1 | | The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 9 | | Adam H. Kerman |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 8 | | Sn!pe |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 7 | | Marco Moock |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 2 | | Sn!pe |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 1 | | D |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 4 | | Retro Guy |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 1 | | Sn!pe |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 2 | | Marco Moock |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 1 | | Adam H. Kerman |
22 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 3 | | Imran Zukhova |
22 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 1 | | Adam H. Kerman |
22 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 1 | | Mr Ön!on |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering) | 1 | | yeti |
21 Apr 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering) | 1 | | Marco Moock |
16 May 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering) | 6 | | immibis |
16 May 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. | 1 | | Sn!pe |
16 May 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself | 4 | | Hassan Nasrallah |
17 May 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself | 3 | | Hassan Nasrallah |
17 May 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself | 2 | | Sn!pe |
17 May 24 | Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself | 1 | | yeti |
7 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 3 | | immibis |
7 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 2 | | Adam H. Kerman |
7 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Sn!pe |
16 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 4 | | Blue-Maned_Hawk |
16 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Frank Slootweg |
16 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Adam H. Kerman |
16 May 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | D |
21 Apr 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | yeti |
10 Oct 24 | Re: Young people peering | 1 | | Schlomo Goldberg |