Re: Young people peering

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ns nntp 
Sujet : Re: Young people peering
De : gtaylor (at) *nospam* tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Groupes : news.software.nntp
Date : 14. May 2024, 23:22:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : TNet Consulting
Message-ID : <v20o6n$qdj$2@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/14/24 12:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
When I worked at Stanford, I set up fairly extensive local newsgroups to capture all sorts of reports and user requests that started out as email.  I really liked that system, and some of my co-workers did as well, but I think it mostly or entirely went away after I left.
I can't say as I'm surprised.
I've long viewed Usenet / NNTP as an early form of publish / subscribe information destination.
If I was in a position to do so, I'd have various things publish current status as articles to newsgroups specifically for the devices.  Then consumers could subscribe to the newsgroups (as a proxy for the devices) they are interested in.
I think this could be especially germane if there was a way to expire / cancel / supersede so that the current status was easily reference.  I /think/ there is some capability to do exactly this in NNTP.  It's just that this capability isn't used in Usenet in general, for -- hopefully -- obvious security implications.

Part of the problem these days is that news clients are a lot rarer than mail clients ...
I'd agree with and raise you that fat mail clients aren't nearly as popular as they once were.
IMHO a web mail client is a poor excuse for an email client.

... don't work in all the ways that people expect mail to work (on the phone, in particular).
I question that.
Mostly because I think people are largely ignorant of many aspects of communications.
Now people will probably liken a Usent article to a posting on some social media site.  Go there, read it there, and comment there.

When I was at an email-heavy job (I'm thankfully not any more), I will say that I found a good mobile email client to be exceptionally good at its job, good enough that I never bothered to set up Gnus for work email (which is what I usually use to let me treat email as if it's Usenet).
I think that a good email client is a very valuable thing.  As indicated above, web based email clients aren't good by any stretch of the imagination.

Being able to triage email on the train is incredibly useful and I'm dubious there's a mobile news client with the same feature set (although I admit I have not done a ton of research).
Experiencing a good, rather than bad, email client is an eye opener. Experiencing that on mobile is awe inspiring.
No, I don't consider what I'm currently using to be good.  At best it's the least evil.
--
Grant. . . .

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Apr 24 * Young people peering100The Doctor
14 Apr 24 +- Re: Young people peering1Marco Moock
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering6Retro Guy
14 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
14 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Young people peering2rek2 hispagatos
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Young people peering1dgold
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
10 Oct 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering5Stefan Ram
15 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering2candycanearter07
15 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
7 May 24 i`* Re: Young people peering2immibis
7 May 24 i `- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Niklas H
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering2John Levine
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1David Ritz
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering38Kyonshi
16 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering33The Doctor
17 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Young people peering31Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iii+* Re: Young people peering19Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii+* Re: Young people peering3Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiiii`* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
17 Apr 24 iiiii `- Re: Young people peering1Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiii`* Re: Young people peering15The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii +* Re: Young people peering4Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: Young people peering1rek2 hispagatos
17 Apr 24 iiii i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii `* Re: Young people peering10SugarBug
14 May 24 iiii  +* Re: Young people peering8Van Camp
14 May 24 iiii  i+* Re: Young people peering5Russ Allbery
15 May 24 iiii  ii+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
15 May 24 iiii  iii`* Re: Young people peering2Russ Allbery
16 May 24 iiii  iii `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
19 May 24 iiii  ii`- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
14 May 24 iiii  i+- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
15 May 24 iiii  i`- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
10 Oct 24 iiii  `- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg
18 Apr 24 iii`* Re: Young people peering11candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii `* Re: Young people peering10Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: Young people peering9candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: Young people peering8Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: Young people peering6Grant Taylor
18 Apr 24 iii     +* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     i`* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
19 Apr 24 iii     i `- Re: Young people peering1Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     `* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
19 Apr 24 iii      `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
17 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering4Stefan Ram
18 Apr 24 i `* Re: Young people peering3Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Young people peering2Computer Nerd Kev
19 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
19 Apr 24 `* Re: Young people peering44The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
19 Apr 24  +* Re: Young people peering42Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24  i`* Re: Young people peering41Retro Guy
19 Apr 24  i +* Re: Young people peering2Ted Heise
20 Apr 24  i i`- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24  i +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24  i `* Re: Young people peering37The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
20 Apr 24  i  +* Re: Young people peering4Marco Moock
20 Apr 24  i  i`* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
21 Apr 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24  i  i `- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24  i  +* Re: Young people peering31Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  i+* [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)23The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24  i  ii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.14Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24  i  iii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.9Adam H. Kerman
21 Apr 24  i  iiii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.8Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.7Marco Moock
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  i`- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1D
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.4Retro Guy
21 Apr 24  i  iiii   +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Marco Moock
21 Apr 24  i  iiii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24  i  iii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.3Imran Zukhova
22 Apr 24  i  iii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24  i  iii `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Mr Ön!on
21 Apr 24  i  ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1yeti
21 Apr 24  i  ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1Marco Moock
16 May 24  i  ii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)6immibis
16 May 24  i  ii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
16 May 24  i  ii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself4Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24  i  ii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself3Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24  i  ii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself2Sn!pe
17 May 24  i  ii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself1yeti
7 May 24  i  i+* Re: Young people peering3immibis
7 May 24  i  ii`* Re: Young people peering2Adam H. Kerman
7 May 24  i  ii `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
16 May 24  i  i`* Re: Young people peering4Blue-Maned_Hawk
16 May 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
16 May 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Adam H. Kerman
16 May 24  i  i `- Re: Young people peering1D
21 Apr 24  i  `- Re: Young people peering1yeti
10 Oct 24  `- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal