Re: Young people peering

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ns nntp 
Sujet : Re: Young people peering
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : news.admin.peering news.software.nntp
Date : 18. Apr 2024, 16:20:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <uvrdna$2aqml$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.com> wrote at 11:03 this Wednesday (GMT):
The Doctor wrote:
>
In article <uvmi06$13lru$1@dont-email.me>, Kyonshi  <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/14/2024 2:11 PM, The Doctor wrote:
What happened to the young people who wanted to set up a Usenet node?
>
define young.
>
I am working on getting one running, although most likely focused on a
few specific groups. but considering I reinstalled the OS at least three
times since I decided to do that it might still take a while.
>
maybe next week or so
>
There was a high school studnet wanting to set up an NNTP node withing the last 3 months!
>
I remember. They just kind of disappeared.
>
The school IT dept probably decided to block Usenet for the safety of "the kids".


Not blocked here! They have more important things to block, like Github
(yes really)
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Apr 24 * Young people peering100The Doctor
14 Apr 24 +- Re: Young people peering1Marco Moock
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering6Retro Guy
14 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
14 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Young people peering2rek2 hispagatos
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Young people peering1dgold
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
10 Oct 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering5Stefan Ram
15 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering2candycanearter07
15 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
7 May 24 i`* Re: Young people peering2immibis
7 May 24 i `- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Niklas H
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering2John Levine
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1David Ritz
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering38Kyonshi
16 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering33The Doctor
17 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Young people peering31Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iii+* Re: Young people peering19Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii+* Re: Young people peering3Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiiii`* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
17 Apr 24 iiiii `- Re: Young people peering1Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiii`* Re: Young people peering15The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii +* Re: Young people peering4Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: Young people peering1rek2 hispagatos
17 Apr 24 iiii i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii `* Re: Young people peering10SugarBug
14 May 24 iiii  +* Re: Young people peering8Van Camp
14 May 24 iiii  i+* Re: Young people peering5Russ Allbery
15 May 24 iiii  ii+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
15 May 24 iiii  iii`* Re: Young people peering2Russ Allbery
16 May 24 iiii  iii `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
19 May 24 iiii  ii`- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
14 May 24 iiii  i+- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
15 May 24 iiii  i`- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
10 Oct 24 iiii  `- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg
18 Apr 24 iii`* Re: Young people peering11candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii `* Re: Young people peering10Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: Young people peering9candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: Young people peering8Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: Young people peering6Grant Taylor
18 Apr 24 iii     +* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     i`* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
19 Apr 24 iii     i `- Re: Young people peering1Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     `* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
19 Apr 24 iii      `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
17 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering4Stefan Ram
18 Apr 24 i `* Re: Young people peering3Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Young people peering2Computer Nerd Kev
19 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
19 Apr 24 `* Re: Young people peering44The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
19 Apr 24  +* Re: Young people peering42Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24  i`* Re: Young people peering41Retro Guy
19 Apr 24  i +* Re: Young people peering2Ted Heise
20 Apr 24  i i`- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24  i +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24  i `* Re: Young people peering37The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
20 Apr 24  i  +* Re: Young people peering4Marco Moock
20 Apr 24  i  i`* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
21 Apr 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24  i  i `- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24  i  +* Re: Young people peering31Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  i+* [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)23The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24  i  ii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.14Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24  i  iii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.9Adam H. Kerman
21 Apr 24  i  iiii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.8Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.7Marco Moock
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  i`- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1D
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.4Retro Guy
21 Apr 24  i  iiii   +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Marco Moock
21 Apr 24  i  iiii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24  i  iii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.3Imran Zukhova
22 Apr 24  i  iii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24  i  iii `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Mr Ön!on
21 Apr 24  i  ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1yeti
21 Apr 24  i  ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1Marco Moock
16 May 24  i  ii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)6immibis
16 May 24  i  ii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
16 May 24  i  ii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself4Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24  i  ii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself3Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24  i  ii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself2Sn!pe
17 May 24  i  ii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself1yeti
7 May 24  i  i+* Re: Young people peering3immibis
7 May 24  i  ii`* Re: Young people peering2Adam H. Kerman
7 May 24  i  ii `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
16 May 24  i  i`* Re: Young people peering4Blue-Maned_Hawk
16 May 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
16 May 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Adam H. Kerman
16 May 24  i  i `- Re: Young people peering1D
21 Apr 24  i  `- Re: Young people peering1yeti
10 Oct 24  `- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal