Sujet : Re: Maximize Cistern Volume -- (cut out 4 squares (at Corners) and discard them)
De : news.dead.person.stones (at) *nospam* darjeeling.plus.com (Mike Terry)
Groupes : rec.puzzles sci.mathDate : 06. May 2025, 23:29:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vve2h1$3uu47$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
On 06/05/2025 20:47, Richard Tobin wrote:
In article <14b4afbbf6091c2c839beec0c3c41f21@www.novabbs.com>,
HenHanna <HenHanna@dev.null> wrote:
What's not at all obvious (intuitive) for me is.... why or how
the max Volume is achieved at x=1/6
Note that x=1/6 makes the total area of the sides equal to the area of
the base (4/9). I wouldn't be surprised if that is a special case of
some more general result.
-- Richard
That makes sense - when we make the 4 cutout squares bigger, increasing their side length by a very small amount s, the effect on the cistern is, broadly
a) increase the height by s, which /increases/ its volume by A.s
[A being the area of the base]
b) decrease the "radius" of the box by s, which /decreases/ its volume by B.s
[B being the area of the sides]
So at the maximum volume these two effects must cancel out, and we will have A = B. Yes there are higher order changes in volume involving s^2 and higher powers, but we neglect those as small compared to first order changes.
This is in effect doing calculus from scratch, ignoring higher order terms in s to get the derivative dV/dx which is set to zero. The ignoring of higher terms is like what happens in the proof of the product rule for derivatives.
Mike.