Re: (1 Combination 2) = 0 -- Better explanation?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s lang 
Sujet : Re: (1 Combination 2) = 0 -- Better explanation?
De : HenHanna (at) *nospam* devnull.tb (HenHanna)
Groupes : comp.lang.python sci.math sci.lang
Date : 15. Jul 2024, 20:49:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v73r04$ql49$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/14/2024 8:44 PM, Jeff Barnett wrote:
On 7/14/2024 2:57 PM, HenHanna wrote:
>
Python says:  (1 Combination 2) = 0
>
         Ok... It's Impossible (to do).
>
              ------- is there a Better explanation?
>
>
>
(5 Combination 0) = 1  <---- This is explained by  Comb(5,0)=Comb(5,5)
>
                                      in general:   Comb(N,r)=Comb(N,N-r)
>
_______________________________________
>
from math import comb
>
for i in range(6):      print( comb(5,i) )
>
print( comb(1,2)  )

 Let combination of n things taken m at a time be represented by [n,m]. Then [n,m] = [n,n-m] as you correctly note above. Further, we have the computational formula [n,m] = n!/(m!(n-m)!) where x!  is simply x factorial. So [1,2] = 1!/(2!((-1)!)), or 1/2 divided by (-1)!. However factorial of a negative integer is, by convention, an infinite value so [1.2] = 0.
THank you...
  Bard.Google.com   says that
                     Comb(1,2) is not defined
                 factorial(-1) is not defined
                 factorial(-2) is not defined
             GammaFunction(-1) is not defined
             GammaFunction(-2) is not defined

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jul 24 * (1 Combination 2) = 0 -- Better explanation?5HenHanna
15 Jul 24 +* Re: (1 Combination 2) = 0 -- Better explanation?3Jeff Barnett
15 Jul 24 i`* Re: (1 Combination 2) = 0 -- Better explanation?2HenHanna
16 Jul 24 i `- Re: (1 Combination 2) = 0 -- Better explanation?1Jeff Barnett
16 Jul 24 `- Re: (1 Combination 2) = 0 -- Better explanation?1Ben Bacarisse

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal