Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 19. May 2025, 00:12:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100dph6$17uss$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/18/2025 5:41 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:
 
Are you aware of the fact that in
>
{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
...
{1, 2, 3, ..., n}
...
>
up to every n infinitely many natural numbers of the whole set
>
{1, 2, 3, ...}
>
are missing? Infinitely many of them will never be mentioned
individually. They are dark.
 Presumably you are aware that for every n in ℕ, n will be mentioned in
infinitely many such sets?  They are bathed in light.
 Do they still let you teach this stuff?
 
Clearly you do not understand that any
action that takes an infinite amount of
time will never be completed. There is
always some n in ℕ that no one ever
got around to mentioning.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May 25 * Simple enough for every reader?39WM
18 May 25 +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?20Mikko
18 May 25 i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ross Finlayson
18 May 25 i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?18WM
18 May 25 i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ross Finlayson
18 May16:12 i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
19 May14:59 i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
19 May19:56 i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
20 May08:17 i i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
19 May14:57 i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?12Mikko
19 May19:53 i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11WM
20 May08:18 i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Mikko
20 May12:17 i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
22 May10:10 i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Mikko
22 May11:30 i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
23 May08:43 i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Mikko
23 May09:31 i        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
24 May09:13 i         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
24 May12:29 i          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
25 May11:42 i           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
25 May12:38 i            `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
18 May23:41 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?18Ben Bacarisse
19 May00:12  +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2olcott
19 May19:46  i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
19 May19:44  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?15WM
20 May01:50   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14Ben Bacarisse
20 May08:22    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
20 May12:15    i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
21 May01:51    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse
20 May12:11    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10WM
21 May02:17     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9Ben Bacarisse
21 May12:02      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8WM
23 May14:21       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7Ben Bacarisse
24 May09:18        +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
25 May02:09        i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ben Bacarisse
25 May11:43        i `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
24 May11:50        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
25 May02:27         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ben Bacarisse
25 May09:29          `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal